The Orville or Star Trek: Discovery?


Star Trek: Discovery vs the “New” space adventure series The Orville

So, which is it to be? Seth MacFarlane’s sci-fi parody, The Orville, or CBS All Access’s new flagship series, the latest iteration of the 50 year old franchise, Star Trek: Discovery?

Well, honestly, there’s no comparison. The clear winner here is Star Trek: Discovery which pulled well ahead with it’s third episode, taking the series in a completely unexpected direction and confounding critic’s predictions. It is traveling the inroads that have been made for televised science fiction by series like Ronald D. Moore’s Battlestar Galactica reboot and currently with The Expanse.

Star Trek is reinterpreting itself to fit in with the modern television landscape. It’s a series that has been designed with the binge-watching audience in mind. It also doesn’t feel the need to slow down and explain everything.

The Orville, on the other hands is firmly planted in the same territory that was mined by Star Trek and Star Trek: The Next Generation decades ago. The stories are heavy handed and moralistic, but with a lighter than ice cream tone. It is meant to be a parody but it only seems to remember that occasionally when it tries to inject some lame joke in the middle of the drama. And the jokes are lame. Seriously.

The funniest moment of a recent episode was probably one of the subtlest bits of comedy the show has ever attempted. Bortus, an alien crew member, stops and stares at his partner who is eating Rocky Road ice cream and watching The Sound of Music because he is depressed and has chosen a human cure for depression. That one silent moment was the high point of humor for a series that has relied on crude jokes and cultural and racial stereotypes for much of its comedy.

Discovery, on the other hand, seems to have its feet firmly in the stirrups. Once the viewer realizes that the entire season is one whole story arc (and in this day and age of Netflix and other streaming services, that realization shouldn’t be difficult) then the first two episodes, what would, in iterations past be presented as the “pilot” episode, was, in fact, merely the cold open of a much larger story. To judge the series, as many have done, based on the first two would have been akin to giving up on one of the other series episodes based solely upon the pre-credit teaser.

The other aspect of The Orville that has been remarked on by others, most notably by Steve Barnes, author of Twelve Days, and co-author of Dream Park and The Legacy of Heorot, is it’s tendency to cast actors of color as aliens, while the human cast remains mostly white. Of the main cast only Penny Johnson (Cassidy Yates from Deep Space Nine) as the ship’s doctor is not portrayed in a culturally stereotypical way. I have commented elsewhere that The Orville is Star Trek for white viewers who are uncomfortable with too much cultural diversity.

Discovery, on the other hand, embraces diversity right out of the gate with the main character being Michael Burnham, a woman of color (played by Sonequa Martin Green) as first officer to Captain Georgiou, an Asian woman (played by Michelle Yeoh)

Though that relationship does not continue throughout the series, the diversity in cast members is laudable in comparison with the half-hearted attempt at it by The Orville.

The Orville has further added to its unoriginal provenance in its fourth episode which posits a generation ship that situation that mirrors Harlan Ellison’s The Starlost so closely that I wouldn’t be surprised if Harlan were to launch a lawsuit against Fox in the coming days. That episode more closely resembled The Starlost than James Cameron’s The Terminator resembled Ellison’s Outer Limits episode “Soldier”, but we all know how that turned out.

I’m not going to draw this out any longer. For my money, Star Trek: Discovery is the superior show. It is traveling down new roads and, I am confident, it will blaze some roads of its own before the current story arc has finished unspooling.

The Orville, meanwhile, seems destined to boldly go where much better shows have gone before.

The Captains (2011)


A bit of a change of pace, now. Netflix also has a fine selection of documentary films and one that caught my eye as I was browsing was THE CAPTAINS, a feature length documentary written and directed by William Shatner.

I am a huge Star Trek fan. I’m never happier then when I am watching Star Trek. So this documentary was pleasant viewing for a lazy Sunday morning. William Shatner travels around the country (and, in the case of Patrick Stewart, to England) to conduct candid, one-on-one interviews with all of the other actors who have played captains in the various Star Trek TV and movie iterations. The interviews range from the silly (Shatner sitting in a cardboard box in New York waiting for Kate Mulgrew, Shatner arm wrestling with Chris Pine at the gate of Paramount Studios),Shatner trying to sing with Avery Brooks) to the confrontational, to the intimate (Shatner bonding with Patrick Stewart). Through the series of conversations Shatner explores the differences and the similarities of each actor’s experience with the lead role in each Star Trek series.

If you are interested in acting this movie might interest you. If you are interested in learning about the challenges of being a lead in a demanding TV series, then this documentary might have something for you.

But, honestly, I cannot recommend this film to anyone who isn’t a Star Trek fan. I suspect that Star Trek fans, and only Star Trek fans will ever really appreciate this film. Star Trek fans, and, in particular, fans of William Shatner, are about the only ones who will really appreciate what is in this documentary.

Because at the end of it all, the star of this film is William Shatner and Shatner’s ego certainly does come into play. This is particularly evident in the way he walks around the Star Trek convention in a number of sequences. His presence causes a stir among the fans and he know it and he plays it up.

I don’t mean to say anything too disparaging about Shatner. I’ve met him. He’s a fellow Canadian, so I do feel an affinity with  him. I like the man. He’s an actor, though, and as an actor he is, naturally, self absorbed, as, indeed are the other actors that are featured in this film (with the possible exception of Scott Bakula, who comes across relatively free of rampaging ego).

If you can look past the self absorption, the ego gratifying moments, this film will give you  an insight into what it is like to be a lead actor in a Star Trek series, or any TV series and the sometimes painful toll that exacts on one’s personal life.

There are moments of levity and silliness and there are moments of great pathos. Some scenes are emotionally raw, like when Shatner and Bakula compare the way that the series proved disastrous for their marriages. The pain in Scott Bakula’s eyes that he isn’t quite able to hide, is heartbreaking.

If you are not a Star Trek fan, if you’re only casually interested in Star Trek, give this film a miss. If, however, you are a die-hard fan of the series, in any or all of its various incarnations,then this documentary is for you.